Self-Scrutiny
I
|
think
writing aphorisms suits me because I have a fundamentally untidy mind. I keep
promising myself I will find the time to tidy it up, but so far have never
managed to get round to it. Procrastination, of course, is one of the symptoms
of an untidy mind.
I was pleased to learn from a
psychologist when I was doing military service that I had a Stanford-Binet IQ
of 164 (160 Wechsler). Unfortunately, he did not tell me that I was lacking in
a quality which such IQ tests did not measure, namely, simple common sense. Nor
did he tell me that I was selfish, ungrateful and often unreliable, as my
mother and sister frequently pointed out. If only I had been able to trade off
some IQ points for some common sense and a better character, I would have been
spared a great deal of later suffering.
I now realize that certain masters
who disliked me at school were quite right. I daresay that, had I met myself in
my teens, I should have been tempted to administer a good thrashing. Looking
back, I can see that whatever my other strong points, my friends and family
were right in telling me that I was devoid of common sense. It took me decades
to acquire it, painfully. A pity it couldn’t have been made into an academic
subject and taught in school, where I could have acquired it quickly and
systematically and later produces a certificate to show I possessed it.
Why is it that students who least
need common sense always study subjects like Law, which helps to inculcate it
common sense, while students who lack it study subjects which cannot make up
for this deficiency, like Arts or Science? The answer is to be found in the New
Testament, namely that “To them that hath it shall be given, while from them
that hath not it shall be taken away”.
I was lucky to be educated in a
single-sex school. The presence of girls in the class would have made it almost
impossible for most of us to concentrate. We would crowd to the window if a girl
so much as appeared on the drive. Boys in co-educational schools seldom do as
well as those in their single-sex rivals. Testosterone needs isolating.
My natural religion is Buddhism. I
am completely at home in it, as I could never be in any other creed. Past lives
(many in East and Southeast Asia ) have wrought
this. I am struck by the fact that K., my closest friend for years when I was
younger, has also become a Buddhist, having arrived at Buddhism from Marxism
via Existentialism. He claims he remembers our being together, centuries ago,
in a monastery. We were both rather rebellious monks.
I dreamt about Cambridge for years after I went down. I owe
that university an immense, forever unpayable, debt. My seven years there (four
as an undergraduate Major Scholar, three as a Bachelor Scholar of my college)
shaped my intellectually for life. I have never found a university that came
near it, except perhaps for the American Ivy Leaguers. No wonder it
consistently ranks as Britain ’s
top university. Most universities today have become over-crowded intellectual
refugee-camps, filled with the bewildered intellectually displaced, many of
whom are travelling on false passports.
In my day, Oxbridge was heavily
afflicted with young fogies. “Is there life before death?” I used to murmur
despondently, as I listened to their self-satisfied platitudes in the Junior
Common Room debates. They were invincibly conservative public school or grammar
school boys who wore sports coats and cavalry twill trousers; sported old
school or college ties; derived their limited opinions from the Daily Telegraph; went to church of
college chapel regularly on Sundays, clad in three-piece suits; avoided sex or
even heavy petting before marriage; took rugger, rowing and cricket with devout
seriousness and behaved decorously at all times, even during May balls.
Typically, these young geriatrics were reading Classics, Law, Medicine or
Estate Management. They almost never read Natural Sciences, Moral Sciences or
English. They were prone to writing irate comments in the Junior Common Room
complaints register about members of the college who behaved in one of the many
ways of which they did not approve. The predominance in the Establishment of
such young fogies who had mellowed imperceptibly into old fogies eventually
drove me in desperation to leave England .
I once applied for a post with the
British Council, hoping to find refuge overseas from Anthony Eden’s England . When I
appeared before the interviewing panel, my heart sank. It appeared to be
composed entirely of middle-aged Oxbridge fogies, one of whom I recognized as a
former young fogie from my own college. Need I say that I did not get the job?
I took five Firsts in four years at
Cambridge, in English and Oriental Languages, taking parts I and II of the
Oriental Languages Tripos together in my final year. Since for over half this
time I was married, living on a shoestring, my second child being born on the
day my final results appeared, I still wonder how I accomplished it.
I fell into sinology almost by
mistake. I went to the Senior Tutor of my college, Peter Hunter-Blair, an
Anglo-Saxon scholar, to ask him permission to sit for the Charles Oldham
Shakespeare scholarship examination, which I was pretty sure I could get. To my
astonishment he said, contemptuously: “Is this the best you can do, Frodsham?
Pot-hunting!”
Taken aback by this unexpected
reception, I replied, somewhat lamely, that it was a highly prestigious pot. He
then asked me if there wasn’t some other subject I should like to study,
pointing out that if I took another First in English (the results were due out
the following week), the college would continue my major scholarship. To this
day I do not know why I told him I should like to study Chinese, a desperately
recondite subject in those days. Surprisingly, he was enthusiastic about it,
for reasons which still escape me. Probably he though, rightly, that I needed
taking down a peg or two and that the difficult Oriental Languages Tripos might
administer a salutary drubbing.
That morning I walked over to Selwyn Gardens ,
to see Gustav Haloun, a German scholar who held the Chair of Chinese. He
grilled me for half an hour or so before accepting me and then sent me off with
a letter of introduction to the Oriental Languages Library in Brooklands Avenue ,
where I borrowed a dozen or so grammars and histories. By the time term opened
in October, four months later, I had already ploughed my way enthusiastically
and autodidactedly through the classical Chinese of the Xiao Jing (Classic of Filial Piety) and a large chunk of Mencius and The Analects, as well as being somewhat acquainted with 3,000 years
of Chinese history, philosophy and art. I could also read simple modern
Chinese, though I found the texts boring after the classical ones. Perhaps all
this was simply due to the karma of a previous life – or lives – finally coming
to fruition. Many of the major decisions of our lives are taken for reasons of
which we are consciously unaware, though like hypnotised subjects, we always
have a semi-plausible explanation for our actions.
I was lucky to have encountered a
benevolent Professor of Chinese who would take students. The story goes that an
earlier incumbent of the Chair had sat stony-faced listening to students
explaining why they wanted to read Chinese before replying: “There are about
100,000 Chinese books in the University Library. When you have read them all,
come back here and I’ll recommend some more”. I have the uneasy feeling that
this story might well be true. All too often, some Cambridge academics saw students as simply a
damned nuisance and were under no compulsion to accept them.
Professor Haloun died of a coronary
on his fifty-second birthday, a few months after I had begun to study under
him. His death shocked me so greatly I could not open a book for a week, but
simply walked around in a daze. This was my first close encounter with the
death of someone I knew and greatly admired. Some deaths, the Chinese say, are
as heavy as Mount
Tai . His was one of them.
The time I have frittered away
watching TV or indulging in idle conversation would have sufficed to enable me
to master at least half a dozen languages. But what would I have done with them
except perhaps to watch TV or chatter idly in the languages I had acquired?
COPYRIGHT (C) 2010 J D FRODSHAM
No comments:
Post a Comment